|
Post by Hunt on Jan 30, 2013 19:40:29 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Eastwood on Feb 8, 2013 15:10:49 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by dpgauthier on Feb 10, 2013 14:11:05 GMT -6
Just to clarify, this tourney is singles the first round and not alternate shot doubles? Also, cash on tourney day and no PayPal or anything beforehand, correct?
|
|
|
Post by Eastwood on Feb 11, 2013 2:50:03 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by dpgauthier on Feb 11, 2013 5:17:14 GMT -6
Cool, thanks. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Eastwood on Feb 12, 2013 3:36:26 GMT -6
You're welcome. Someone else asked, just so you know, it's combined score too.
|
|
|
Post by dpgauthier on Feb 12, 2013 5:12:12 GMT -6
Yeah, I talked to TD via email. Looking forward to it.
|
|
|
Post by Hunt on Feb 12, 2013 21:58:25 GMT -6
Warmness and food will most likely be supplied for $5 across the street @ Castaways between rounds! Gotta confirm completely...will keep y'all updated.
|
|
|
Post by Hunt on Feb 21, 2013 14:53:03 GMT -6
CONFIRMED: Castaways WILL be serving lunch between rounds Choices: Fish, Chicken or Cheesburger and Fries $5.00 Drink not included adult or soda
Hope to see ya'll there!
|
|
|
Post by bub2010 on Feb 25, 2013 12:40:50 GMT -6
Just wondering, but I played there last year at Frosted Flat Rocks... Just wondering, but you guys use PDGA ratings for determining which division you play in right? (it didn't look like this was a PDGA sanctioned event) Both me and my partner are rated under 900. Last year I was new to tournaments and had just gotten a PDGA # and wasn't sure what division we played in... it may have been novice if you had that last year... if not it had to have been Rec.
|
|
|
Post by Eastwood on Feb 26, 2013 23:21:49 GMT -6
We don't have an official "sandbagger" law. Good faith effort is the rule. Other somewhat unspoken rules: if you won the division, it's time to step it up (unless that win was in pro open). If you're partners w/a big dog, you'll play w/the big dogs. If you're shooting around 900ish or lower, you can legitimately play in rec/novice/beginner (unless you partner up, see previous "rule") And no matter what division you play in, expect to take some shiite from your buds about not playing up If you show up w/these plates, we've been wanting to meet you: And you'll be playing open! In all seriousness tho, you make the call. It's not sanctioned, it's a charity event.
|
|
|
Post by bub2010 on Feb 27, 2013 6:40:54 GMT -6
Ok.. Rec it is.. I mean.. in the last year we've both won some events, but we're older guys.. he's 42 and I'm 38 and when you start the game so late in life you are only gonna get so good. I looked and last year we scored a 170 in Rec (tied for 4th) and last payout was a 162 in intermediate... we'd have totally gotten clobbered if we were upclassed. I could care less about "bagger status" I have a rating of 884 simply because I consistently can't play better and that is the reason for the ratings and if the day isn't somewhat competitive then I'd rather not show up. Same with Larry.. we've played countless rounds together both in Tournaments and casual... there are good and bad games, but our abilities are what our abilities are. Thanks.. and see you this weekend.
|
|
|
Post by Hunt on Feb 27, 2013 6:48:41 GMT -6
Like Boden said once ya win a division we ask that you move up! Once we start sanctioned events it'll be easier on us to help make the decision to place competitors. Most people make the right decision anyway Side more: If you purchase 18 mulligans you will receive 5 raffle tickets!
|
|
|
Post by bub2010 on Feb 27, 2013 14:41:19 GMT -6
Well.. yep.. we haven't won this tourney as a pair that is for sure. Sanctioned or not you could always reference people's PDGA ratings, but either way I think most people know where they should be based on their ratings and relative skill compared to other folks unless they aren't PDGA members... Sure... we can all have a hot round or 2 here and there, but it is the consistency to do it over and over again that makes your rating. On another note.. I totally forgot about the mulligan factor... Last year I have no idea how many anyone paid for or how many I did for that matter. That also makes it interesting because you are playing against the "mulligan factor". Someone could have 18 of them and all but guarantee a pretty decent round for the singles portion... but then again.. you could have someone that takes zero mulligans and ends up 3-5 over par where they could have been -13 with mulligans. Definitely makes things interesting. It literally gives everyone a chance at coming in 1st if they are willing to put the max cash behind it. Just to clarify.. mulligans are to be taken 1 per hole max and it can be any shot... correct? (drive, midrange, or putt) Oh.. and also... if you take a mulligan... you HAVE to take it and not have the choice (in case somehow your 2nd shot is worse)
|
|
|
Post by Eastwood on Feb 27, 2013 16:54:34 GMT -6
You're correct on mulligan usage. From what I've seen, it doesn't change the normal round score all that much, since if you use it you must take that shot, and it's not always better....definitely strategy and discipline are involved.
|
|